On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 02:56:52 +0100 Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who am I Theo asked, a big fat nobody (maybe), but I started this > issue to begin with and after criticizing Theo for being unnecessary > rude to Richard I have noticed that Richard keeps avoiding the facts! > > Richard you continue to avoid the questions or issues brought forth by > Theo, could you please focus on the issue rather than commenting the > same statements over and over again! FULL ACK! Richard, please answer to the (following) issues/facts brought up by Theo! > Theo wrote: > > > On the bsd talk show you did not withhold your recommendation > > because the ports system suggests non-free programs. No way, > > that's not what you said on that show. > > > > What actually happened is that you withheld your recommendation > > because it CONTAINS non-free programs; that is what your words were. > > This is the TRUTH, anybody can hear that for himself, and that's why I > wrote to the list in the first place! > > > It turns out that the above assessment was based on a complete lack > > of research. It was uneducated, and you should have apologized for > > the error. > > > > You were really clear in your interview. And wrong. > > > > Later on, on this mailing list, you have changed your statements to > > say that your recommend against OpenBSD because it now... RECOMMENDS > > non-free software. > > Clearly the TRUTH as well! We have all witnessed that! > > > We've made it quite clear that Emacs and gcc recommend the use of > > non-free software, by directly containing code to support those > > systems. The ports tree does not contain code to support non-free > > components. It simply provides URLs to a few select things which > > people might wish to use. Itself, it contains no non-free code and > > makes no recommendations. But gcc and emacs directly contain code > > which RECOMMENDS compilation on non-free systems, by actually > > compiling and running there. > > This is the TRUTH! By containing code which recommends compilation on > non-free system then Richard you are doing MORE to support non-free > than the OpenBSD ports system is! That's a fact! That's NOT an > opinion. > > > You are a hypocritical liar, Richard. > > > > Your lies taint the efforts of the entire FSF and GNU communities. > > > > Shame on you all for letting Richard mislead you so. > > I am sorry Theo, I know you don't give a rats ass, but you are right, > and you have been right all along! > > Dear Richard unless you actually address the above mentioned issues, > in context of the e-mail from Theo, you will look hypocritical! You > say what you don't do yourself. > > Best regards. > > Rico Secada.
