Earlier -
http://www.nabble.com/Real-men-don%27t-attack-straw-men-tp14256924r0p14344642.html
- Richard appears to have explained how when free software programs support
already-known non-free operating systems, that will not lead to people not
already using those OS to start using them - but by including references to
non-free programs in the ports system, OpenBSD can lead people not already
using non-free programs to using them.
The fact that tons of people use GCC on windows and tons of closed
source developers choose GCC for embedded/windows development still
encourages using GNU for non-free software.
As does Wine, promoting non free software too.
No matter how you look at it.. BSD will always be a safer argument in a
purism flamewar because there is no purism laws. There is free software
in free software.. but there is no free redefined free.
The GNU website should be changed to 'stallmanism'.
The words free should be removed.
If they are not removed by 7:04 Mountain Time, I will spank the people
with a paddle.
L505
