Fred:

Might it be possible that:

1) the military is listening to what the public "says", and appears to be 
taking a rational approach to their perceived problems and has decided to avoid 
making the same mistakes twice.

2) Congress and the White House are listening in a similar manner, and have 
decided to stonewall it - - "All the loudmouth violent disrupters at our town 
hall meetings that disagree with us are Nazi fascists or Rush Limbaugh 
ditto-heads, and are dangerous people that should be locked up in our new 
National Guard internment camps."

Hmmmmm? just speculating. Maybe it's a mixed blessing/danger that 'they' are 
listening to what the public is saying.

Jim Hornaday




________________________________
From: Fred B. Ellison <fbelli...@yahoo.com>
To: MLC Google Group <missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com>; Young 
Conservatives <ty...@googlegroups.com>
Cc: Campaign for Liberty-SGF <springfield...@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 12:41:11 PM
Subject: Big Brother is Watching and Listening



http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090810/D99VV4M80.html
 
 
Air Force used Twitter to track NY flyover fallout

  
Aug 10, 6:11 AM (ET)

By RICHARD LARDNER 
 
 
(AP) This undated photo released by the Defense Department shows one of the 
president's official planes,...
Full Image    
 
  WASHINGTON (AP) - As the Pentagon warns of the security risks posed by social 
networking sites, newly released government documents show the military also 
uses these Internet tools to monitor and react to coverage of high-profile 
events. 
The Air Force tracked the instant messaging service Twitter, video carrier 
YouTube and various blogs to assess the huge public backlash to the Air Force 
One flyover of the Statue of Liberty this spring, according to the documents. 
And while the attempts at damage control failed - "No positive spin is 
possible," one PowerPoint chart reads - the episode opens a window into the 
tactics for operating in a boundless digital news cycle. 
This new terrain has slippery slopes, though, for the military. Facebook, 
MySpace and other social media sites are very popular among service members, 
including those in Iraq and Afghanistan who want to keep in touch with friends 
and family. The sites are also valued by military organizations for recruiting 
or communicating with other federal agencies. 
But posting information on these interactive links makes it vulnerable to being 
lost or stolen by the enemy, according to Pentagon officials. On Thursday 
hackers shut down Twitter for several hours, while Facebook had intermittent 
access problems - an indication of the shortcomings of relying on these 
services. 
The Marine Corps' computer network blocks users from accessing social media 
sites, which service officials say expose "information to adversaries" and 
provide "an easy conduit for information leakage." 
The Marines recently made its ban official. And that prohibition might extend 
to other parts of the military pending a top-level review ordered in late July 
by Deputy Defense Secretary Bill Lynn. 
In a widely distributed memo, Lynn said the so-called "Web 2.0" sites are 
important tools but more study is needed to understand their threats and 
benefits. 
Air Force officials are already aware of the potential benefits. 
According to the Air Force One documents released through the Freedom of 
Information Act, a unit called the Combat Information Cell at Tyndall Air Force 
Base in Florida monitored the public fallout from the April 27 flight and 
offered recommendations for dealing with the fast-breaking story. 
Formed two years ago, the cell is made up of as many as nine people who analyze 
piles of data culled from the Internet and other sources to determine whether 
the Air Force's message is being heard. 
The presidential plane took off for New York from Andrews Air Force in Maryland 
accompanied by two F-16 jet fighters. The purpose of the flight, which wasn't 
publicly announced, was to get new photos of the specially modified Boeing 747 
with the statue in the background. 
The mission quickly became a public relations disaster as panicked New Yorkers, 
fearing another 9/11-style attack, emptied office buildings. In the aftermath, 
Louis Caldera, director of the White House military office that authorized the 
flight, was fired. 
The Combat Information Cell's first assessment of the event said "Web site blog 
comments 'furious' at best." Local reporting of the flyover was "very critical, 
highlighting scare factor," it added. 
A Twitter search revealed a rate of one "tweet" per minute about a pair of 
F-16s chasing a commercial airliner. A tweet is a text message of up to 140 
characters delivered to the author's subscribers, who are known as followers. 
Media coverage over the next 24 hours "will focus on local hysteria and lack of 
public notification," the cell predicted. "Blogs will continue to be 
overwhelmingly negative." 
"Damage control requires timely counter-information," but the opportunity for 
that had passed, the assessment said. The cell recommended acknowledging the 
mistake and ensuring it didn't happen again. 
Another update on April 28 said the story was still "reverberating, 
surprisingly resilient." The tweet rate had grown to three per minute and the 
words "New York" had been pushed into Twitter's high-frequency topic category. 
Videos of the event posted on YouTube had been viewed more than 260,000 times, 
it said. 
By April 30, the story had faded, the cell reported. The blogs were still very 
critical, but it was the White House, not the Air Force, that was taking the 
heat, the assessment for that day said. 
The other dominant news story at the time was public concern over the spread of 
swine flu. According to the documents, the same Air Force cell suggested there 
may be an opportunity to turn the tide. "Government involvement in this 
incident could be used to frame expected handling of H1N1 outbreak," one of the 
PowerPoint charts reads. 
A Utah Air National Guard unit, the 101st Information Warfare Flight in Salt 
Lake City, was also monitoring the social sites. "To say that this event is 
being beaten like a dead horse is an understatement," reads an April 28 e-mail 
from the unit to other Air Force offices. "Has really taken off in Web. 2.0." 
Both the 101st and the Combat Information Cell are attached to the 1st Air 
Force, which is based at Tyndall and is in charge of guarding U.S. airspace. 
1st Air Force spokesman Al Eakle explained that the command had no role in 
planning or coordinating the Air Force One flight. But the units tracked social 
networks and blog traffic "to obtain what lessons we might learn so as not to 
repeat them in the future." The assessments were sent to the command's 
leadership so they'd know how the public was reacting, he added. 
John Verdi of the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington said gray 
zones can emerge while monitoring social networking sites because viewing and 
participating is based on trust. 
"Lots of times individuals upload private or sensitive information that they 
expect to share with their friends or family and not the whole Internet world," 
Verdi said. "It would certainly be a major problem if the government were 
accessing that information under false pretenses." 
Paul Bove, an Air Force digital media strategist, said service personnel are 
instructed not to do that. Nor are they to use aliases or represent a position 
that's beyond the scope of what they do. 
"We always tell people, 'Stay in your lane and don't talk about something that 
you're not qualified to talk about,'" Bove said. 
The issue of aliases is at the heart of a complaint stemming for the Army Corps 
of Engineers' performance in New Orleans before and after Hurricane Katrina. 
On Tuesday, Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., asked the Pentagon inspector general to 
examine allegations that Corps employees posed as ordinary citizens and posted 
comments on a New Orleans web site defending the organization from criticism 
following the disaster. 
Jon Donley, former editor of NOLA.com, said in a June 9 affidavit that there 
were as many as 20 registered users who developed a pattern of not only 
defending the Corps, but at times being "overtly abusive" to any critics. He 
said he was able to trace their posts to a Corps Internet address. 
Ken Holder, a spokesman for Corps' New Orleans District, said it will cooperate 
with any investigation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to 
take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic 
purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and 
sacrifice for that freedom." - John F. Kennedy

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, 
or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and 
evidence." - John Adams 

"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of 
justice is no virtue." - Barry Goldwater

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachmments are confidential and 
may be protected by legal privilege. The information contained herein is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient and any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or reliance on this message or any attachment by unintended 
recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
please notify us immediately by replying to this email and deleting it from 
your computer. 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
This is a Free Speech forum. The owner of this list assumes no responsibility 
for the intellectual or emotional maturity of its members.  If you do not like 
what is being said here, filter it to trash, ignore it or leave.  If you leave, 
learn how to do this for yourself.  If you do not, you will be here forever.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to