I've spent a LOT of time looking and I sure can't find one. I now understand that the MFA estimates mpg by looking at rpm, vacuum, and miles traveled. It does not measure actual fuel consumption. So I don't see how a 99.9 reading could be blamed on a vacuum leak since the MFA should interpret that as WOT or close to it and estimate a low mpg.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: MFA Accuracy In a message dated 6/22/01 7:16:07 AM, [email protected] writes: << So the impression I get is that a low mpg reading is likely a vacuum leak and a high reading is probably a bad sensor on the back of the cluster. >> Low mpg is usually a vacuum leak. A reading of 99 mpg is a big vacuum leak. _____________ List Sponsor: http://www.netsville.com To remove yourself from this list, send mail to [email protected] with 'unsubscribe a2_16v' in the body of your message See us on the web at http://www.a2-16v.com Visit the 16V Homepage at http://www.gti16v.org
