The MFA does use rpm.  Try disconnecting your tach signal wire from the coil.  
(green on earlier cars, Black/red on Motronic)
Your MPG will skyrocket just as if you have a vacuum leak.

Darron Schneider wrote:

> The MFA might not use rpm in it's mpg estimate but...
>
> Why would it monitor rpm at all?  It certainly does not need it for any
> other function.  If you put it in test mode, one of the readings is rpm.
>
> The mpg would be more accurate this way too since fuel efficency changes
> with load and rpm.  I mean that a 60 mph cruising speed will generate a
> certain mpg reading in fifth gear and a different mpg reading in fourth.
> Those of you with fully functioning MFA's can see that too (instantaneous
> mpg) in test mode.
>
> I'm sticking with my theory.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Caldwell [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 1:45 PM
> To: Darron Schneider
> Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
> Subject: RE: MFA Accuracy
>
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Darron Schneider wrote:
>
> > I've spent a LOT of time looking and I sure can't find one.  I now
> > understand that the MFA estimates mpg by looking at rpm, vacuum, and miles
> > traveled.  It does not measure actual fuel consumption.  So I don't see
> how
> > a 99.9 reading could be blamed on a vacuum leak since the MFA should
> > interpret that as WOT or close to it and estimate a low mpg.
> >
>
> Heh.. i had it backwards too.  I car pulls MORE vacuum at idle than it
> does at WOT.  Think of it this way... the car is trying to pull in as much
> air as it possibly can, but since the throttle is closed it's pulling
> against that resistance.  So, the less vacuum you're pulling the more the
> engine is loaded down.  I don't actually think rpm comes in to play at any
> point in the calculation, because you only need two things to calculate
> MPG- load and speed.  vacuum takes care of load, and speed, well, you get
> the idea. :)  So, if anything- a vacuum leak should make your mfa read
> lower than normal.  I'm assuming when it reads 99.9 mpg that it's just
> confused...
>
> _____________
> List Sponsor: http://www.netsville.com
> To remove yourself from this list, send mail to [email protected] with 
> 'unsubscribe a2_16v' in the body of your message
> See us on the web at http://www.a2-16v.com
> Visit the 16V Homepage at http://www.gti16v.org

_____________
List Sponsor: http://www.netsville.com
To remove yourself from this list, send mail to [email protected] with 
'unsubscribe a2_16v' in the body of your message
See us on the web at http://www.a2-16v.com
Visit the 16V Homepage at http://www.gti16v.org

Reply via email to