I don't understand why the 16v would have a higher insurance premium than the other cars on this thread. They all seem to be in the same category as far as an insurance company would be concerned. Besides, anything with "GT" "X" or "R" in the model name is a insurance markup I would think. The other cars mentioned are good choices but why not just get another GTi? I don't think insurance will be much different. There is already talk about swapping motors, how about a bare bones Rabbit, Golf or Jetta and drop a 16v in it.
Rich Blake 88 GTi16v 88 Jetta >----Original Message Follows---- >From: "olivier cabanes" <[email protected]> >To: a2_16v list <[email protected]> >Subject: 16v is gone... >Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 20:21:43 -0400 > >Yesterday, the 1992 16v was sold...may she rest in peace. I think she >went in a good home because the guy is a mechanic and it's his fourth >dub (never owned a 16v tough...). >Anyway, I'm looking for a new car that would be a lot of fun to drive >but that wouldn't have the crazy insurance premium the 16v has. I was >thinking something like a a2vr6, a mazda 323 gtx or a CRX hybrid. I >thought I'd ask you guys because many of you own a few cars and have >owned quite a few. I even think someone on the list bought a gtx323 last >year. _____________ List Sponsor: http://www.netsville.com To remove yourself from this list, send mail to [email protected] with 'unsubscribe a2_16v' in the body of your message See us on the web at http://www.a2-16v.com Visit the 16V Homepage at http://www.gti16v.org
