In a message dated 7/10/2001 8:12:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
> > > I don't understand why the 16v would have a higher insurance premium than > the other cars on this thread. They all seem to be in the same category as > far as an insurance company would be concerned. Besides, anything with "GT" > "X" or "R" in the model name is a insurance markup I would think. The other > cars mentioned are good choices but why not just get another GTi? I don't > think insurance will be much different. There is already talk about > swapping motors, how about a bare bones Rabbit, Golf or Jetta and drop a 16v > I'd have to agree with this, my 323 GTX cost me a few bucks more a year than my GTi -Mike
