On 2/11/2017 9:20 AM, Maksym Veremeyenko wrote: > any objection against introducing *mlt_image_yuv422p10* ? >
I am in full support of 422 and planar formats. Just wondering about the bit packing. What would be the corresponding AV format? Would it be 16 bpp with 6 bits unused? BE or LE? If it is going to be 16bit samples, then why not call it mlt_image_yuv422p16 and use it for any bit depth between 9 and 16? ~Brian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Mlt-devel mailing list Mlt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlt-devel
