On 12.02.2017 0:23, Brian Matherly wrote: > On 2/11/2017 9:20 AM, Maksym Veremeyenko wrote: > > any objection against introducing *mlt_image_yuv422p10* ? > > > > I am in full support of 422 and planar formats. Just wondering about the > bit packing. > > What would be the corresponding AV format? > > Would it be 16 bpp with 6 bits unused? BE or LE? > AV_PIX_FMT_YUV422P10LE
> If it is going to be 16bit samples, then why not call it > mlt_image_yuv422p16 and use it for any bit depth between 9 and 16? introducing *mlt_image_yuv422p16* that equal to AV_PIX_FMT_YUV422P16LE (http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=blob;f=libavutil/pixdesc.c;h=3b9c45d035f5f2399a652a00b41832f55a8febe1;hb=HEAD#l1496) fine to me... -- Maksym Veremeyenko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Mlt-devel mailing list Mlt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlt-devel
