that's exactly what i was afraid of and why I haven't upgraded yet..I might just move to arch for my work laptop aswell
On 1 May 2011 18:07, Ramon Casha <ramon.ca...@linux.org.mt> wrote: > I upgraded but I'm totally underwhelmed by Natty's Unity AND the Gnome3 > shell. It seems that these interfaces both try to aim for the lowest common > denominator. I don't consider this to be a step forward at all. I like a > system that provides me with the ability to tweak it exactly as I want, not > a system that is fixed in what someone considered the best option for > everyone. > > > Ramon Casha > > > > On 1 May 2011 12:20, Keith Vassallo <kei...@me.com> wrote: > >> Watch out upgrading if you have an ATI graphics card. Major problems on >> some models. >> >> Wouldn't boot on my sister's laptop >> >> K >> >> On 01 May 2011, at 11:01, Andrew Cilia wrote: >> >> The sane,sober,sensible aviators have spoken. If it works, don't fix it. >> >> >> On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 09:10 +0200, Paul Morley wrote: >> >> Yes I totally agree Daniel, the big thing about Linux is choice and the >> ability to tweak. >> I am still using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS but tweaked with: >> >> The Kernel is 2.6.38-8 patched for lucid >> Nividia graphic kernel is 260.19.44 >> LibreOffice 3.3.2 >> Thunderbird 3.1.10 with Charemel 1.4.1 theme. >> Rhythmbox and Evolution removed, and lots more minor changes. >> >> So will be staying away from Unity 11.04 as I'm happy with my current >> setup. >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> On 05/01/2011 08:31 AM, Daniel wrote: >> >> In my opinion in 11.04 its not the googling and tweaking which is a >> problem (although when googling I don't find all the answers !!!) but it is >> going to limit our freedom in tweaking the system. If it becomes like >> windows where we can just change a few flashy things but not more, then the >> community will look for alternatives....... >> >> Daniel >> >> Hi All, >> >> Anyone installed 11.04? I'm kind of apprehensive about the new interface >> breaking my carefully assembled linux box.... last upgrade, my scanner >> didn't work and it needed a day of googling and tweaking to get it >> moving again... >> >> Joseph >> _______________________________________________ >> MLUG-list mailing >> listmlug-l...@linux.org.mthttp://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> >> >> -- >> <Mail Attachment.jpeg> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MLUG-list mailing >> listmlug-l...@linux.org.mthttp://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MLUG-list mailing >> listmlug-l...@linux.org.mthttp://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MLUG-list mailing list >> MLUG-list@linux.org.mt >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MLUG-list mailing list >> MLUG-list@linux.org.mt >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > MLUG-list mailing list > MLUG-list@linux.org.mt > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list > >
_______________________________________________ MLUG-list mailing list MLUG-list@linux.org.mt http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
