OldGrantonian wrote:
> On Sep 21, 8:45 am, Dougie Nisbet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>   
>>>  Perhaps you need to write down your
>>>  requirements then methodically try as many flashcard programs as
>>>  possible to find the one that best fits your needs.
>>>       
>
> Here are some of the programs I tried before settling on Mnemosyne:
>
> supermemo
>   
I still use supermemo on my PDA and find the portability great. My main 
requirement is botanical identifications and remembering latin and 
common plant names. So moving on to mnemosyne and taking advantage of 
the ability to use images was the main attraction for me. Have you 
looked at anki? ( http://ichi2.net/anki/ ). I discovered it by reading 
older posts on the mnemosyne mailing list and decided to give it a try. 
Initially I loved it but before long found it too complicated and had 
lots of extra features that I didn't want and just got in the way. Again 
a lot of it is down to personal preference. I like using hot-keys a lot 
and any program that forces me to use the mouse when a keypress will do 
usually gets ditched. mnemosyne's rather sparse interface is something I 
find quite appealing, and the ability to process and entire stack of 
flashcards using only keypresses is essential for me.

Often just by searching the web you can find many folk have done a lot 
of the hard work on the comparison for you. I found the blog at 
http://www.glowingfaceman.com/blog/anki-vs-mnemosyne/ helpful in 
deciding which program to use. My own setup is described at 
http://theaccidentalarborist.blogspot.com/search/label/mnemosyne

Good Luck!


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to