On 10/16/07, troels knak-nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's bordering on arrogant to assume that people who want to > use MochiKit must be geeky enough to use SVN. Most > javascripters aren't.
I find it no less arrogant to demand that other people devote alot of their time in maintaining free software, without getting anything in return. I sure as hell owe the MK developers alot already (or at least my employer does), so I don't dream of asking for anything more, seeing as I'm in the exact same position as Bob described: there's simply so much other more important (read paying) stuff going on. Most people are in one of two situations: 1. Already using MK. If it's working and you're happy with it, why do you need a release? If it is not, a release won't help much. 2. Looking for a JS library. If MK in it's current form does what you need, again - why do you want a release? If it doesn't, there are plenty of other good options. If you (not targeting Troels specifically, but the general reader) find that you want a release simply to get *other* people to use MK: If that is important to you, then you sound like the person that should be stepping up as a maintainer. Arnar --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
