On 10/17/07, Jonathan Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 16, 3:20 pm, "Arnar Birgisson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Most people are in one of two situations: > > > > 1. Already using MK. If it's working and you're happy with it, why do > > you need a release? If it is not, a release won't help much. > > That's the thing, the cutting edge is a moving target and those of us > who started using MK 1+ years ago have seen our requirements get > steeper but MK not keep pace. So a lot of us are in the position of > "it's working, we have code invested in it, but we're NOT really happy > with it anymore."
Sadly, that's always a danger when investing in software, free or not. I've on many occasions been in the situations where there was even a support contract in place. The good thing about open source is that in that case you are able to extend it with the things you need (or pay someone to do it). > Before you start frothing at the mouth, I'm not claiming Bob or you or > anyone else owes me anything. My apologies, I regret that the tone in my previous post implied that I thought so. I just felt we were going in circles discussing the same thing over and over. > Although a little communication is kind > of an implicit obligation when you take something like this public, > it's not hard to tell what it means in this case. Absolutely, and I believe that obligation has been met by the MK maintainers (btw I don't consider myself one of them). cheers, Arnar --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
