There's no need to fork the project, I would gladly hand over SVN access to someone who wants to step up as a release manager.
-bob On 10/29/07, gsteff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't use Mochikit, but like the library, and check in on the > newsgroup now and then. If a lot of people want to see new features > added to Mochikit, or at least an acknowledgement that the new > features already added are stable (via a new release), the normal > solution I think is for someone to fork the project. > > Greg > > On Oct 17, 11:58 am, "Arnar Birgisson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/17/07, Jonathan Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 16, 3:20 pm, "Arnar Birgisson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Most people are in one of two situations: > > > > > > 1. Already using MK. If it's working and you're happy with it, why do > > > > you need a release? If it is not, a release won't help much. > > > > > That's the thing, the cutting edge is a moving target and those of us > > > who started using MK 1+ years ago have seen our requirements get > > > steeper but MK not keep pace. So a lot of us are in the position of > > > "it's working, we have code invested in it, but we're NOT really happy > > > with it anymore." > > > > Sadly, that's always a danger when investing in software, free or not. > > I've on many occasions been in the situations where there was even a > > support contract in place. > > > > The good thing about open source is that in that case you are able to > > extend it with the things you need (or pay someone to do it). > > > > > Before you start frothing at the mouth, I'm not claiming Bob or you or > > > anyone else owes me anything. > > > > My apologies, I regret that the tone in my previous post implied that > > I thought so. I just felt we were going in circles discussing the same > > thing over and over. > > > > > Although a little communication is kind > > > of an implicit obligation when you take something like this public, > > > it's not hard to tell what it means in this case. > > > > Absolutely, and I believe that obligation has been met by the MK > > maintainers (btw I don't consider myself one of them). > > > > cheers, > > Arnar > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
