Hi all, On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Gerald Richter wrote: > there are so many factors, so they are very difficult to compare. True. But nevertheless I think it's a very useful bit of work because the thing that stands out is that all (server) dynamic content comes at a high cost in processor cycles. This won't come as a surprise to most of you. Be aware too that even the fastest of these benchmarks is not an outstandingly fast setup. The lesson is obvious: if you're looking for high throughput, think long and hard about your system architecture, in the widest possible sense, and keep server-generated dynamic stuff to a minimum. Having said that, most of us won't be pushing the limits most of the time (and if we are we're probably secretly quite pleased about it:). 73, Ged.
- Linux Hello World Benchmarks: +PHP,JSP,ePerl Joshua Chamas
- Re: Linux Hello World Benchmarks: +PHP,JSP,ePerl Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Linux Hello World Benchmarks: +PHP,JSP,ePer... Joshua Chamas
- Re: Linux Hello World Benchmarks: +PHP,JSP,ePer... Gerald Richter
- Re: Linux Hello World Benchmarks: +PHP,JSP,... G.W. Haywood
- Re: Linux Hello World Benchmarks: +PHP,JSP,ePer... Perrin Harkins
- Re: Linux Hello World Benchmarks: +PHP,JSP,ePer... JR Mayberry
- Re: Linux Hello World Benchmarks: +PHP,JSP,... Joshua Chamas
- Re: Linux Hello World Benchmarks: +PHP,... newsreader
- Re: Linux Hello World Benchmarks: ... Joshua Chamas
- Re: Linux Hello World Benchmarks: +PHP,JSP,... Roger Espel Llima
- [bordering on OT] Re: Linux Hello World... Blue Lang
- Re: [bordering on OT] Re: Linux He... Roger Espel Llima
- Single proc ->multi proc modperl
- Re: Single proc ->multi pro... Joshua Chamas