>It seems too
> many artists today just do things 'cos they think >it's 'hip', 'passe' 
> or
> 'kitsch' or whatever. No imagination whatsoever. 
Dorian, I'd disagree - I don't think it's that lazy or the motivation 
that simple. I don't neccesarily like much of it, but I can appreciate 
where it's coming from - if you go down the 'call that art, I could do 
that' line you end up back with the sort of attitudes modernism was 
meant to break down (the sort of things that lead to broadsheet 
newspapers still having a 'Music' section just classical, and the rest 
is 'Pop'). . Just remembered one piece I do like - a Rachel Whitehead 
one where she's suspended fragments of something exploding in a room - 
when you're far enough that you can't see the wires, it looks exactly 
like a freeze-frame photo of an explosion, but you can move round it - 
kind of like a fine-art equivalent to that trick photography in The 
Matrix.

Helen - not got the Broadcast LP (got it on order) but the gig last week 
was wonderful - really good use of film projections with lots of 60s/70s 
educational footage (atoms, bees, cells, space footage, etc). Take it 
you have the United States of America LP? Have you checked the 
soundtrack to Midnight Cowboy too - the Elephants Memory track is almost 
identical to a Broadcast song.
_________________________________________________________
Enlighten your in-box.         http://www.topica.com/t/15

Reply via email to