At 12:06 AM 3/31/2000 -0800, you wrote: >John Drefahl wrote: > > Well I have asked myself this question many times.. Have we taken >the > > mediums to the point of exhaustion? >If that's the only game in town, maybe. Or maybe we'll learn to move on >from judging things just in terms of whether they advance things. > > > Have we done everything that is > > to be done. >As worried about in the C19th, at least. > > > Now it seems we just recreate it over and > > over again.. as if it was an excercise. >Doesn't that depend on your attitude - if you put something of yourself >in, or just want to recreate someone elses work. >________________________________________________________________________ >Start an Email List For Free at Topica. http://www.topica.com/register _________________________________________________________ Enlighten your in-box. http://www.topica.com/t/15
- Re(2): Pop Art (was Blow Up Club Graphics Type Thing) Dorian M. Cox
- Re: Re(2): Pop Art (was Blow Up Club Graphics Type Thi... Helen Barrell
- RE: Re(2): Pop Art (was Blow Up Club Graphics Type Thi... Julian Lawton
- RE: Re(2): Pop Art (was Blow Up Club Graphics Type Thi... Helen Barrell
- RE: Re(2): Pop Art (was Blow Up Club Graphics Type Thi... John Drefahl
- RE: Re(2): Pop Art (was Blow Up Club Graphics Type Thi... Julian Lawton
- RE: Re(2): Pop Art (was Blow Up Club Graphics Type Thi... Julian Lawton
- RE: Re(2): Pop Art (was Blow Up Club Graphics Type Thi... gordon wallace
- RE: Re(2): Pop Art (was Blow Up Club Graphics Type Thi... Julian Lawton
- RE: Re(2): Pop Art (was Blow Up Club Graphics Type Thi... John Drefahl
- RE: Re(2): Pop Art (was Blow Up Club Graphics Type Thi... John Drefahl
- RE: Re(2): Pop Art (was Blow Up Club Graphics Type Thi... Helen Barrell
- Re: RE: Re(2): Pop Art (was Blow Up Club Graphics Type... dangeddes
