This isn't a good idea IMO.

-more was always a set of most used plugins, this always was the core idea of 
having a -more pluggable, so I don't need to go through the Forge and download 
Sortables/Slider/Keyboard.

That said, through the years of working with MooTools (since version 0.9 - it 
didn't even had the MooTools object back then), I can compile a list of -more 
Classes that I never use:

Lang
Log
Depender
Date.Extras
URI
URI.Relative
Element.Forms
Form.Request.Append
OverText
Fx.Move
Request.Queue
Request.Periodical
Color
Group
HtmlTable
HtmlTable.Zebra
HtmlTable.Sort
HtmlTable.Select
Mask

I'm sure I'm not the only one who doesn't use these.

I know Aaron had put a lot of hours in getting them into -more, but to me, it's 
just bloating the final compilation with stuff that people don't use - and 
believe me when I say, 95% of people using more-builder just checks all 
classes, and not only the ones that they eventually will be using.

Also, Validation/Locales doesn't seem to me like "low level" stuff. It's an 
addition, to Date/etc. I've seen your work on the new Locales class, great job, 
but again, how many people actually use Locale, 5%?

O.

On 2010-09-25, at 12:59, Arian wrote:

> Like Aaron said the plan is to separate UI components out of -more for
> the next major release after 1.3 (probably 2.0) and focus more on
> lower level stuff (Drag/Locale/Validation/Types extensions/...) while
> moving UI stuff to the Forge. So although it is a pretty nice plugin I
> don't really feel like including this in -more.
> 
> 
> On 25 sep, 01:40, hartum <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Mooscroller FTW!!!
>> 
>> On 24 sep, 21:12, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Out of curiosity, how many of you good folks would like to see MooScroller 
>>> (http://www.clientcide.com/wiki/cnet-libraries/08-layout/02-mooscroller) in 
>>> -more 1.3?
>> 
>>> -more has a lot of classes that I never use, but this one is the one I keep 
>>> downloading from Clientcide, because -more is missing it.
>> 
>>> Any chance of adding it to 1.3?

Reply via email to