I have about ten plugins on github which I I'll release as a collection too once 1.3 is out. There is no point having a billion plugins inside of one repository. I mean that was the whole point of the forge anyways.
On Sep 25, 10:23 pm, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > Too bad there are no statistics. I'm 99% sure people don't even use half of > those classes. > > I'll just go ahead with my old plan end create MooTools-extras. > > Moving on. > > On 2010-09-25, at 20:33, Christoph Pojer wrote: > > > > > I can tell you that I have used everything of More other the UI stuff > > that didn't exist in the original MooTools before the separation. > > > We have a huge library with plenty of functionality, just because you > > don't use something doesn't mean no one does. > > > Locale, Date.Extras, URI + URI.Relative and Element.Forms are among > > the most useful plugins that *I* use in every project, just as an > > example. Locale is pretty damn awesome. Validator is going to get an > > overhaul "soon" (and then I will definitely use it too). > > > You were the one who initially suggested adding a scrollbar-plugin to > > More, yet you dislike lots of plugins you have never used. Scrollbar > > stuff is quite trivial. Just because I use my own scrollbar > > implementation in some projects doesn't mean I think it is a good idea > > to put it into More. > > > @Aaron what do you think about putting your Scroller into a repo on > > GitHub and see how it does? I'd love that as a first step, rather than > > just adding More stuff (oh snap!). > > > On Sep 25, 3:57 pm, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This isn't a good idea IMO. > > >> -more was always a set of most used plugins, this always was the core idea > >> of having a -more pluggable, so I don't need to go through the Forge and > >> download Sortables/Slider/Keyboard. > > >> That said, through the years of working with MooTools (since version 0.9 - > >> it didn't even had the MooTools object back then), I can compile a list of > >> -more Classes that I never use: > > >> Lang > >> Log > >> Depender > >> Date.Extras > >> URI > >> URI.Relative > >> Element.Forms > >> Form.Request.Append > >> OverText > >> Fx.Move > >> Request.Queue > >> Request.Periodical > >> Color > >> Group > >> HtmlTable > >> HtmlTable.Zebra > >> HtmlTable.Sort > >> HtmlTable.Select > >> Mask > > >> I'm sure I'm not the only one who doesn't use these. > > >> I know Aaron had put a lot of hours in getting them into -more, but to me, > >> it's just bloating the final compilation with stuff that people don't use > >> - and believe me when I say, 95% of people using more-builder just checks > >> all classes, and not only the ones that they eventually will be using. > > >> Also, Validation/Locales doesn't seem to me like "low level" stuff. It's > >> an addition, to Date/etc. I've seen your work on the new Locales class, > >> great job, but again, how many people actually use Locale, 5%? > > >> O. > > >> On 2010-09-25, at 12:59, Arian wrote: > > >>> Like Aaron said the plan is to separate UI components out of -more for > >>> the next major release after 1.3 (probably 2.0) and focus more on > >>> lower level stuff (Drag/Locale/Validation/Types extensions/...) while > >>> moving UI stuff to the Forge. So although it is a pretty nice plugin I > >>> don't really feel like including this in -more. > > >>> On 25 sep, 01:40, hartum <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Mooscroller FTW!!! > > >>>> On 24 sep, 21:12, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> Out of curiosity, how many of you good folks would like to see > >>>>> MooScroller > >>>>> (http://www.clientcide.com/wiki/cnet-libraries/08-layout/02-mooscroller) > >>>>> in -more 1.3? > > >>>>> -more has a lot of classes that I never use, but this one is the one I > >>>>> keep downloading from Clientcide, because -more is missing it. > > >>>>> Any chance of adding it to 1.3?
