I can tell you that I have used everything of More other the UI stuff that didn't exist in the original MooTools before the separation.
We have a huge library with plenty of functionality, just because you don't use something doesn't mean no one does. Locale, Date.Extras, URI + URI.Relative and Element.Forms are among the most useful plugins that *I* use in every project, just as an example. Locale is pretty damn awesome. Validator is going to get an overhaul "soon" (and then I will definitely use it too). You were the one who initially suggested adding a scrollbar-plugin to More, yet you dislike lots of plugins you have never used. Scrollbar stuff is quite trivial. Just because I use my own scrollbar implementation in some projects doesn't mean I think it is a good idea to put it into More. @Aaron what do you think about putting your Scroller into a repo on GitHub and see how it does? I'd love that as a first step, rather than just adding More stuff (oh snap!). On Sep 25, 3:57 pm, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > This isn't a good idea IMO. > > -more was always a set of most used plugins, this always was the core idea of > having a -more pluggable, so I don't need to go through the Forge and > download Sortables/Slider/Keyboard. > > That said, through the years of working with MooTools (since version 0.9 - it > didn't even had the MooTools object back then), I can compile a list of -more > Classes that I never use: > > Lang > Log > Depender > Date.Extras > URI > URI.Relative > Element.Forms > Form.Request.Append > OverText > Fx.Move > Request.Queue > Request.Periodical > Color > Group > HtmlTable > HtmlTable.Zebra > HtmlTable.Sort > HtmlTable.Select > Mask > > I'm sure I'm not the only one who doesn't use these. > > I know Aaron had put a lot of hours in getting them into -more, but to me, > it's just bloating the final compilation with stuff that people don't use - > and believe me when I say, 95% of people using more-builder just checks all > classes, and not only the ones that they eventually will be using. > > Also, Validation/Locales doesn't seem to me like "low level" stuff. It's an > addition, to Date/etc. I've seen your work on the new Locales class, great > job, but again, how many people actually use Locale, 5%? > > O. > > On 2010-09-25, at 12:59, Arian wrote: > > > > > > > > > Like Aaron said the plan is to separate UI components out of -more for > > the next major release after 1.3 (probably 2.0) and focus more on > > lower level stuff (Drag/Locale/Validation/Types extensions/...) while > > moving UI stuff to the Forge. So although it is a pretty nice plugin I > > don't really feel like including this in -more. > > > On 25 sep, 01:40, hartum <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Mooscroller FTW!!! > > >> On 24 sep, 21:12, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Out of curiosity, how many of you good folks would like to see > >>> MooScroller > >>> (http://www.clientcide.com/wiki/cnet-libraries/08-layout/02-mooscroller) > >>> in -more 1.3? > > >>> -more has a lot of classes that I never use, but this one is the one I > >>> keep downloading from Clientcide, because -more is missing it. > > >>> Any chance of adding it to 1.3?
