Too bad there are no statistics. I'm 99% sure people don't even use half of those classes.
I'll just go ahead with my old plan end create MooTools-extras. Moving on. On 2010-09-25, at 20:33, Christoph Pojer wrote: > I can tell you that I have used everything of More other the UI stuff > that didn't exist in the original MooTools before the separation. > > We have a huge library with plenty of functionality, just because you > don't use something doesn't mean no one does. > > Locale, Date.Extras, URI + URI.Relative and Element.Forms are among > the most useful plugins that *I* use in every project, just as an > example. Locale is pretty damn awesome. Validator is going to get an > overhaul "soon" (and then I will definitely use it too). > > You were the one who initially suggested adding a scrollbar-plugin to > More, yet you dislike lots of plugins you have never used. Scrollbar > stuff is quite trivial. Just because I use my own scrollbar > implementation in some projects doesn't mean I think it is a good idea > to put it into More. > > @Aaron what do you think about putting your Scroller into a repo on > GitHub and see how it does? I'd love that as a first step, rather than > just adding More stuff (oh snap!). > > On Sep 25, 3:57 pm, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: >> This isn't a good idea IMO. >> >> -more was always a set of most used plugins, this always was the core idea >> of having a -more pluggable, so I don't need to go through the Forge and >> download Sortables/Slider/Keyboard. >> >> That said, through the years of working with MooTools (since version 0.9 - >> it didn't even had the MooTools object back then), I can compile a list of >> -more Classes that I never use: >> >> Lang >> Log >> Depender >> Date.Extras >> URI >> URI.Relative >> Element.Forms >> Form.Request.Append >> OverText >> Fx.Move >> Request.Queue >> Request.Periodical >> Color >> Group >> HtmlTable >> HtmlTable.Zebra >> HtmlTable.Sort >> HtmlTable.Select >> Mask >> >> I'm sure I'm not the only one who doesn't use these. >> >> I know Aaron had put a lot of hours in getting them into -more, but to me, >> it's just bloating the final compilation with stuff that people don't use - >> and believe me when I say, 95% of people using more-builder just checks all >> classes, and not only the ones that they eventually will be using. >> >> Also, Validation/Locales doesn't seem to me like "low level" stuff. It's an >> addition, to Date/etc. I've seen your work on the new Locales class, great >> job, but again, how many people actually use Locale, 5%? >> >> O. >> >> On 2010-09-25, at 12:59, Arian wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Like Aaron said the plan is to separate UI components out of -more for >>> the next major release after 1.3 (probably 2.0) and focus more on >>> lower level stuff (Drag/Locale/Validation/Types extensions/...) while >>> moving UI stuff to the Forge. So although it is a pretty nice plugin I >>> don't really feel like including this in -more. >> >>> On 25 sep, 01:40, hartum <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Mooscroller FTW!!! >> >>>> On 24 sep, 21:12, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>> Out of curiosity, how many of you good folks would like to see >>>>> MooScroller >>>>> (http://www.clientcide.com/wiki/cnet-libraries/08-layout/02-mooscroller) >>>>> in -more 1.3? >> >>>>> -more has a lot of classes that I never use, but this one is the one I >>>>> keep downloading from Clientcide, because -more is missing it. >> >>>>> Any chance of adding it to 1.3?
