There has to be a difference between what you call a poster  with missing paper 
and brought back to a complete poster. If less than 20/25% is missing as an 
example, then maybe you can call it a restoration...anymore than that, it has 
to be call a recreation. There has to be a standard (somewhere) in this hobby.

Doug -
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Richard Evans 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 5:25 PM
  Subject: Re: [MOPO] FRANKENSTEIN 1/2 sheet vs TC from Heritage


  The Mummy from what I know about it, "poor".
  I think the Frankenstein half-sheet should have been graded as "poor", if 
that poor wasn't I don't know what is.
  I thought Grey got is right though with "has an "apparent" grade of fine.
  The restoration didn't change it's condition, just it's appearance.




  On 30 Aug 2009, at 21:56, Richard Halegua Comic Art wrote:


    what grade would the 50% recreated Mummy 1sh be called???

    if either poster was not restored, that woul dbe poor condition
    restored has to move it up a grade on the scale and would be salable if it 
was backed or not, if for nothing more than curiosity

    of course, we all have different grading systems

    Bruce's very good or my very good or Seans or Heritage's are not at all the 
same




    At 01:51 PM 8/30/2009, bqjansen wrote:

      Still you should not call it "fair". These grades imply an objectivity no 
matter how rare the object is. Getting back to my furniture reference. One 
original leg does not make a Chippendale in fair condition.

      Wim
      Op 30 aug 2009, om 22:40 heeft Richard Halegua Comic Art het volgende 
geschreven:


        I actually agree with Grey 100% on this issue

        whether the poster was restored to the quality of a Studio-C or Poster 
Mountain restoration, the description in my opinion is just fine

        they do not create any illusions on the item, grades as fair/restored 
and the picture tells the story
        the fact that it is one of one makes it a desired item regardless of 
less than perfect artistic quality

        now, keep in mind, nothing keeps the current owner of the item from 
getting it re-restored with the work of a better artist than the one who 
previously worked on the poster, which would of course make it considerably 
more presentable

        Rich


        At 01:28 PM 8/30/2009, Smith, Grey - 1367 wrote:

          JR
           
          You mention "silk purse from a...", perhaps, but when it is the only 
sow's ear on earth, it is assuredly, in many people's eyes, a silk purse!
           
          Concerning including an image of the title card next to the half 
sheet, not a bad idea but where does that end? Should we end up trying to offer 
comparisons on all we sell. This is exactly why we continue to offer the 
service of high res images forever on our site and are the only poster seller 
that does so. As Heritage has always suggested, educate yourself on anything 
you purchase. Thus the reason for the link to comparables on every page of our 
auctions. This is also something that only Heritage offers to their bidders.
           
           
          From: MoPo List [ mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
James Richard
          Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 2:40 PM
          To: [email protected]
          Subject: Re: [MOPO] FRANKENSTEIN 1/2 sheet vs TC from Heritage
           
          I might be so audacious and impertinent as to suggest that a 
responsible and highly-regarded auction house catering to the very well-to-do 
and regularly selling tens of millions of dollars of high-priced collectibles 
every year would have taken it upon themselves to include a high resolution 
picture of the title card along with the half sheet auction so that the bidders 
could have made the comparison themselves at the time of the sale.

          But I guess I'm just being naive... despite the cries of shock and 
horror over the last few days, "let the buyer beware" is still the Golden Rule 
in our society.

          -- JR

          Douglas Ball wrote: 
          Side by side, yes, but when the auction took place it looked damn 
good!
           
          Doug 
            ----- Original Message ----- 
            From: JOHN REID Vintage Movie Memorabilia 
            To: [email protected] 
            Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 7:04 PM 
            Subject: Re: [MOPO] FRANKENSTEIN 1/2 sheet vs TC from Heritage 
             
            There is indeed a very big difference between the two.


           

          Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
          ___________________________________________________________________
          How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
          Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
          In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
          The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
          Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
          ___________________________________________________________________
          How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
          Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
          In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
          The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
        ___________________________________________________________________
        How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
        Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
        In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
        The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



    Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
    ___________________________________________________________________
    How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
    Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
    In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

    Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
    ___________________________________________________________________
    How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
    Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
    In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.




  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
  Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to