Hi Todd - perhaps you are already doing this , howevere what about a
behind the scenes video showing the forencics being done on the
posters? the video could be posterd on Youtube and learn about
posters and your sites and offer a priner
on how poster verification is done. Plus it would allow you to
explain the process to the novice collector and offer the
service.This could be used also to get new clients as a promotional
video.
best, Tom
>
>
>---- Original Message ----
>From: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [MOPO] waiting for a public apology from rick ryan? I
>probably shouldn't hold my breath
>Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:07:14 -0700
>
>>Dale,
>>
>>The forensic lab said this can occasionally happen, the staining
>process remained neutral and there could be many reasons for this.
>But one possible reason they gave was that the samples we are using
>are so small. In this particular sample there was not a change in the
>acid/alkaline/pH staining so another paper is being retested by the
>same lab and by a separate forensic lab that we have also employed.
>We should have answers back any day now. We are trying to be as
>minimally invasive as possible and the samples we are taking are from
>the back side layer of the poster and are truly minute.
>>
>>I am NOT charging Dave for this extra service, and as he stated we
>are both sure this poster is the real deal. I just wanted to have
>absolute validity as we continue to understand the forensic testing
>capabilities. On another note, out of the 63 poster we have had
>forensically tested, this is the first time the test was NOT
>conclusive in determining the age and they stated it as such which I
>relayed to Dave.
>>
>>We have a NEW WEBSITE that goes into more detail about the forensic
>testing. www.mpgrading.com
>>
>>Regards
>>Todd Spoor
>>www.mpgrading.com
>>Sent from my iPad
>>
>>On Oct 27, 2011, at 10:11 PM, Dale Dilts <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>
>>> full disclosure....an interesting thing. The actual paper test
>results on
>>> the Italian Job Printers's Proof came back saying something to the
>effect of
>>> "inconclusive", paper may be from the 1980's"...........
>>>
>>>
>>> wtf...
>>>
>>> Am I the only one that needs a forensic break down of the paper
>timeline
>>> here?
>>>
>>> It can be determined that a rolled Thing poster from 82' is fake,
>but you
>>> cannot determine that a 69' Italian job is 100% date authentic.
>>>
>>> I am starting to think the sniff and rub test is better than the
>wack a
>>> piece of paper off and date testing.
>>>
>>> I am trying to love the paper forensics, but it just is not
>feeling right
>>> yet and there is not enough information out there for the folks
>that are
>>> buying sub thousands of dollars or paper out there and maybe that
>is the
>>> only target audience.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>David
>>> Lieberman
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 6:44 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [MOPO] waiting for a public apology from rick ryan? I
>probably
>>> shouldn't hold my breath
>>>
>>>
>>> As requested by rixposterz rick ryan, we sent 4 of our ROLLED
>never folded
>>> 1960's-1970's one sheets to Todd Spoor at MP Grading for
>authentication.
>>>
>>> He said that if we did this, and that if Todd authenticated them,
>that he
>>> would publicly apologize for accusing us of selling "questionable"
>rolled
>>> one sheets from the late 60's and 70's.
>>>
>>> We agreed to humor him, so we sent some in to be authenticated.
>>>
>>> We asked rick SEVERAL TIMES publicly here on mopo which posters of
>ours that
>>> he thought were "questionable".....as we would have gladly sent in
>any that
>>> he requested. HE NEVER RESPONDED.
>>>
>>> He would not specify which of our posters he thought were
>questionable. Why?
>>> I have no idea.
>>>
>>> We even asked all of mopo if anyone else thought any of our
>posters were
>>> questionable.......and no one responded......so the only one
>person who
>>> thinks some may be questionable......is rick......and again.....he
>won't
>>> even specify which ones!
>>>
>>>
>>> The ones we sent were:
>>>
>>> The Italian Job 1969 2 color ROLLED printer's proof
>>> Secret of Santa Vittoria 1969 ROLLED 1sh
>>> Fantastic Plastic Machine 1969 ROLLED 1sh
>>> (these 3 came from the same source, a "find" from a former studio
>executive
>>> we had a few years ago, a hoard of rolled one sheets from
>1968-1972
>>>
>>> Star Wars ROLLED 1sh first printing 77/21-0
>>>
>>>
>>> All 4 came back with an MP Grading Certificate of Authenticity.
>>>
>>>
>>> So, any time now rick.....any time.
>>>
>>> Why do I get the feeling that it will be some sort of half ass
>apology?
>>>
>>>
>>> full disclosure....an interesting thing. The actual paper test
>results on
>>> the Italian Job Printers's Proof came back saying something to the
>effect of
>>> "inconclusive", paper may be from the 1980's"...........which is
>really
>>> strange. After discussing it with Todd we both pretty much agreed
>that just
>>> by looking at the poster and its age, and the fact that it has an
>NSS stamp
>>> on the back, and the fact that it from the same "find" where every
>poster
>>> this guy had was from 1968-1972, and that no other proof like this
>one has
>>> ever surfaced....that it is authentic.
>>>
>>>
>>> p.s. Todd, thanks.....I'll pay you for the paper tests asap.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>> David A. Lieberman
>>> CineMasterpieces.com <http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/> | Vintage
>Original
>>> Movie Posters
>>> 15721 N. Greenway Hayden Loop, Suite 105 | Scottsdale, AZ 85260
>>> 602 309 0500 | Our Facebook Page
>>> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/CineMasterpieces/7735495839?v=wall>
> |
>>> Office/Gallery Open By Appt. Only.
>>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>>>
>___________________________________________________________________
>>> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>>> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
>>> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>>> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>>>
>>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>>>
>___________________________________________________________________
>>> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>>>
>>> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
>>> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>>>
>>> The author of this message is solely responsible for its
>content.
>>
>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>>
>___________________________________________________________________
>> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>>
>> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
>> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>>
>> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content
>.
>>
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
