That was F-U-N-N-Y man!! You can surely have a career in comedy. And God Bless you for changing the mood on this list that the last couple of days had become unbearable. Thanks, we needed that!
Zeev -----Original Message----- From: MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Johnson Tom Sent: June 13, 2012 5:36 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [MOPO] Gorilla-Proof Packaging As part of my ongoing examination of promotional rhetoric in our hobby, and effort to not be such a MOPO wallflower, I turn to the much-discussed area of shipping, packaging, and "handling." The latter is of course the most ambiguous term of the three--it's pretty clear what shipping and packaging mean, but handling is the one they sometimes get you with. "handling" is the one with all the wiggle room, and if you've ever been handled, you know that wiggle room is a big part of the experience. "No, your honor, that was just a handling charge," is something they hear quite often at the bench in our district courts, usually in vice cases. It's something of a loophole, and if you can get handled in a situation where there is a loophole and enough wiggle room, you just might get off. I am speaking here in legal terms, of course. But I want to focus here about packaging--specifically "Gorilla-Proof" packaging. I have seen this type of packaging touted by a number of dealers. (I don't remember whether Bruce is one of them, but let me be explicit that this post is NOT ABOUT HIM. It is about anyone and everyone EXCEPT HIM). A quick search on Ebay tonight brings up 2240 listings using the phrase "gorilla proof." Let us estimate that 20% of them are listings for actual anti-gorilla storage boxes, locks that gorillas cannot pick, paint that is much more than just waterproof, and plans that are far more than just foolproof. One or two might be for mathematical proofs involving gorillas, like the reflexive property of gorillas, distributive property of gorillas, etc. But the rest are probably packaging claims. Exactly half--1120--of the listings are in the entertainment memorabilia category. That number will of course fluctuate as auctions end and start, so don't hold me to it, but you must agree that makes it pertinent to this forum. If you are starting to feel otherwise, now would be a very good time to utilize the delete button. Whose packaging is truly gorilla proof? If there is a key to this discussion, and that is doubtful, this is it. One of the Ebay sellers making such claims in all their listings is from here in Portland, so I was able to go over and have a look for myself. Sure enough, the proprietor or "Old Weird Heralds" actually has a gorilla on staff who is employed to try to open, bend, or otherwise damage packages prior to their posting. Any that do not pass the test are sent back to the front office for repackaging, which is done by other non-gorilla primates. Personally I think they should get a Gorilla into the front office as a consultant--be a little more proactive--but they have a system, and it seems to work. Continuing my research, I took several of my own movie poster shipments straight from the postman's hands down to the Washington Park zoo, where I scientifically lobbed them over the fence into the Gorilla compound. Here are the results: Package #1 (from Rich Halegua's movieposterbid.com) One gorilla was unable to open, bend or damage the package. However, after consulting with another gorilla, he was able to devise an ad-hoc tool which he used to pick loose enough packing tape to get a start at opening the package. After some effort he extracted the poster, an insert for "Planet of the Apes", which he studied carefully for some time before retreating with several of his peers into the interior of the habitat for what looked like some sort of planning session. I should add that this insert was paper-backed,with minor restoration at the folds). Package #2 (from Heritage) This was a rolled poster in a tube--King Kong (R 1957) one-sheet. The gorilla was able to chew through the strapping tape securing the plastic lid to the tube, and extract the poster. It took him 19.5% longer to do so, however, than with a similar package purchased from a prominent midwestern dealer whom this post is not about. Package #3 (also from Heritage--flat packed). This was actually not a purchase but a returned consignment Heritage sent back to us after we mutually agreed it would be preferable that they not auction the items. The gorilla got it open after fifteen minutes, but flew into a rage when only one poster was inside. We had sent them three posters (one was the extremely valuable recalled x-rated release of "Bang the Drum Slowly") and have our original inventory sheet to prove it, which our pet gibbon Mr. Roberts had jotted down on a note card at some point in the past. The Gorilla bit off two fingers of a keeper, escaped the zoo, climbed the Hawthorne Bridge, (a local historic landmark featured in the unwatchable movie "The Hunted") destroyed a news helicopter that got too close, and plunged into the Willamette River, which by the way is not pronounced "Willa-met," but rather rhymes with "goddammit." Our lawyers will be contacting Heritage posthaste. As a result I am for too upset to continue with the analysis of my research, so I must call it inconclusive at this point. However, I am considering a prolonged trip to Indonesia, so if any of the sellers here can promise Komodo Dragon proof shipping, please let me know and I will respond with my wants list. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
