Quoting ian glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Inserted Platt > > On 8/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Quoting ian glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Platt said, > > > > > > "blacks step to the head of the line because of the color of their skin." > > > > > > Because of ?!? > > > > Affirmative action programs. Where have you been? > Obviously that's what Arlo and others were talking about but you said > "because of the color of their skin". ie you asserted that the color > of their skin was the "cause".
Obviously affirmative action programs in business and college acceptances was what I was talking about. > > >What the ?!?!? Have you listened to yourself in a mirror, Platt. > > > Never mind banning from the board you should be locked up, away from > humanity. > > > > Ah, the incipient dictator reveals himself! > Ah right, so application of law of the land counts as dictatorship > now, does it ? What law? > > > The few you can have "perfectly normal conversations" with dwindle by the > day. > > > > Evidence? > Show me one thread where conversations involving debate with you do > not reduce to trading ad-hominems, precious few. Show me one thread in conversations involving debate with me where I initiated ad hominems. Those who attack me personally can expect the same in return. Two can play at that game. > > > I'm with Dennett and other sophisticated neo-Darwinists (Pirsig > > > amongst them) that suggest there are significant cultural and even > > > genetic differences between ethnic groups that benefit from > > > understanding, but only your dangerous kind of racist prejudice can be > > > attributed to "because of the colour of their skin" as anything like a > > > cause. > > > > Anybody understand what Ian means? > Saying the color of skin is the "cause" is ludicrous (and outlawed in > all civilised countries). "Outlawed?" What law? > Saying cultural differences affect > behaviours is reasonable. Are you suggesting unreasonable speech should be outlawed? How would you define "reasonable?" > > > I suggest you check out your own legal position, Horse, publishing that > shit. > > > > Yes, it is indeed obvious you would like to muzzle all those who disagree > > with > > your superior views. Seig Ian. > All those ? I take this high risk stance (to my own love of freedom) > only with you Platt. ONLY you. Your "love of freedom" ought to apply to everyone. You want to pick and choose who is allowed to enjoy it. That's dictatorship. > (Much to the annoyance of other > censors, I actually do much to keep communication channels open with > others barred from this board in recent years, who depite their > offensive transgressions, still have worthwhile things to say. My > conscience is clear.) Bully for you. Platt ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
