[SA previously]
> I was beginning to read the first post you
> pasted, and found Paul mentioning this, "Chi-tsang's
> "Three Levels of Two Truths". When I yahooed it,
> this
> article came up, and some MD posts came up, too,
> including an [MD] Snakes and Ladders post. I'll
> search through the archives for the [MD] you
> mentioned, as well. Thanks, lots to get started on.
>
> morning trees shade the sun,
> Spiritual Adirondack
As I'm reading the article, "Chi-tsang's 'Three
Levels of Two Truths'" I find this comment to be
familar as follows:
"Chi-tsang appreciates samsaric concreteness and
denies a transcendental Nothingness."
Chi-tsang in the tradition of Nagarjuna, from
what I gather so far, "nirvana is samsara", and thus,
"...samsaric concreteness..." is static quality for
Pirsig mentions static quality is evil. Dynamic
quality is this non-transcendental Nothingness, thus,
it is immediate in experience. This goes well with
what I call, maybe others have too: dq is sq and sq
is dq. I'm pointing at what happens when dq is sq and
vice versa. What happens when this immediate world is
as "nirvana is samsara" and in other words as 'dq is
sq'.
just thinking...
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel
and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
