"I think therefore I am"? Isn't that a basic trick of the ego, using an object to define itself as a subject?
It is said that in Tantric Buddhism, "There are no 'therefores'". On 10/7/07, ian glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Marsha; literally 100% confident ? > There is only one, namely "I think therefore I am." > > Reasonably sure ? is another matter, of pragmatism and value. > > Ian > > On 10/7/07, MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Greetings, > > > > In what facts are you 100% confident? > > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/oct/06/genetics.climatechange > > > > > > Marsha > > > > > > > > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > Archives: > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
