Greetings Ham, Your objection to the MOQ is its lack of 'primary source' and 'purpose'. It seems to me that these two concepts are built on ideas within the evolution and limitations of human knowledge. What proof or experience can you offer for these concepts? In using the word 'primary', you are stating something specific. This adjective leads me to ask why the source couldn't be the third or ninth in series of processes? And the word purpose would imply intention, what can you tell me about this intention and the desired results? I have asked these question before, but you have not given a response. Yet you trot out the word 'nihilism' to point out their absence? It seems to me nothing is absent.
I ask you again: What can you tell me about this ''primary' source' and 'purpose', and how do you know? Marsha Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
