Hi SA, I think Ham believes humour is a sign of not taking philosophy seriously.
(Whereas there is a long tradition of humour in philosophy and philosophy in humour.) Ian On 10/24/07, Heather Perella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Ham] > > (I would have done the same for SA but, > > unfortunately, he has suddenly become antagonistic > > and no longer wishes to > > associate himself with my philosophy.) > > > I don't call it antagonistic. I call it a > comedy. Like when Abbot and Costello can't understand > what their saying in the "Who's on First?" skit. This > is why I laugh. It's not a negative laugh, but a > comedy where misunderstandings and unknowings break in > the tension with a laughter of relief. This is one > way I cope in the face of experiences I don't > understand and that don't make sense to me. > > red, yellow, and orange, > SA > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
