Greetings, Bo, I have great empathy with your mission. I too sometimes try to find the right words. But I cannot imagine a success. The MOQ that RMP has given us is one of words and a couple of diagrams. No matter how brilliant those words and diagrams, I think they are a mixture of intellect and art and not his DQ/sq experience.
The problem I have is that I cannot imagine dynamic quality contained in a level. I believe this is how RMP, in fact, states it. If you put the static/dynamic split in a level, what would you have. You'd have only static quality. Dynamic quality would dissolve. It's would not be there. It is nothing, empty, un-manifested experience, beyond definition, explanation and symbols. To my way of thinking, such a level would collapse. I feel all the words that RMP has written are but a high value intellectual map pointing to an experience of something beyond itself. Being intellectual in no way diminishes such a feat or the Metaphysics of Quality. You are a painter, so I'm sure aware of such DQ/sq experiences. Haven't you found that attempts to describe the experience fall short of the task? My attempts seem to quickly fall into the category of absurd babble. Your arguments to distinguish and create a higher static/dynamic level (view), above the Intellectual Level, have not convinced me. Although I understand and appreciate why you would want to try. Marsha Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
