Is a pencil 'self-aware'?

On Nov 25, 2007 7:34 AM, Akshay Peshwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> [quote]
> > Do you think that a cat can think?
>
> "To think" carries tons of SOM. What you ask is really "are cats
> self-aware"?  Cats are certainly INTELLIGENT but is neither part
> of the social nor of the intellectual levels, particularly the latter
> where the "self-awareness"  term - not belong - but was
> CREATED.
>
> [/quote]
>
> Consciousness (or self-awareness) is nothing but Dynamic Quality, hence it
> is the very essence of all "things" while at the same time existing beyond
> it. We are spiritual beings tied to a mortal framework of body and mind.
>
> Akshay
>
>
> On 24/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>  > Hi Peter
> >
> > On 23 Nov. you wrote:
> >
> > > on one hand your apparent unwavering confidence in your understanding
> > > of the MoQ is persuasive and makes me think I need to understand your
> > > point of view more; on the other hand in your posts your use of common
> > > words with your own specialised meaning, your poor phraseology, your
> > > sometimes patronising responses and that you frequently miss out
> > > conjunctions in your explanations and use unusual punctuation all do
> > > not help your cause.
> >
> > But English is not my first language. In the old days when there
> > were other Europeans around this site I used to find them easier
> > to understand than the "natives". But no sore feelings, I
> > appreciate your honesty.
> >
> > > It could be my weak brain that's the snag and if I were more familiar
> > > with ZAMM and LILA I would be able to decipher better what you mean;
> > > so I hope you don't take those comments too negatively, I say them in
> > > the hope that they can some how lead me to be able to understand you
> > > better.
> >
> > > I'm in the process of reading your SOLAQI update but in the meantime
> > > I'd like to ask you a couple of, for me, important questions:
> >
> > GOOD!
> >
> > > Do you think that a cat can think?
> >
> > "To think" carries tons of SOM. What you ask is really "are cats
> > self-aware"?  Cats are certainly INTELLIGENT but is neither part
> > of the social nor of the intellectual levels, particularly the latter
> > where the "self-awareness"  term - not belong - but was
> > CREATED.
> >
> > If you can stand some more on "intelligence"? It is a biological
> > pattern by way of the neural complexity called brain that makes
> > higher organisms able to store former experience (Read and
> > Write  memory)  and retrieve it - play around with it in imaginary
> > scenarios - what makes them able to learn from experience
> > included seeing other perform an act. At the bio.(cat) level this
> > does not include a self or language, particularly not the internal
> > kind we call "thinking". As the social level rose on top of biology it
> > adopted this pattern and because the biological pattern which
> > spawned "society" were Homo Sapiens, brain and intelligence
> > were enormous. If language was part of the social level from the
> > start or developed is a big question, the Neanderthals certainly
> > lived in family and tribal groups, but did not have language.
> > Anyway, with language came the silent form called "thinking", so
> > did names and a group identity that transcended the animal
> > range. Kingdoms and other "doms" arose. (this is a leap of tens
> > of thousands of years course) I find this passage from ZAMM
> > catching this reality so well.
> >
> >     One must first get over the idea that the time span
> >     between the last caveman and the first Greek
> >     philosophers was short. The absence of any history for
> >     this period sometimes gives this illusion. But before the
> >     Greek philosophers arrived on the scene, for a period of
> >     at least five times all our recorded history since the Greek
> >     philosophers, there existed civilizations in an advanced
> >     state of development. They had villages and cities,
> >     vehicles, houses, marketplaces, bounded fields,
> >     agricultural implements and domestic 381 animals, and
> >     led a life quite as rich and varied as that in most rural
> >     areas of the world today. And like people in those areas
> >     today they saw no reason to write it all down, or if they
> >     did, they wrote it on materials that have never been
> >     found. Thus we know nothing about them. The ``Dark
> >     Ages'' were merely the resumption of a natural way of life
> >     that had been momentarily interrupted by the Greeks.
> >
> > This also shows that - to Phaedrus - "The Greeks" are the pivot
> > point that changed everything , in ZAMM they meant the coming
> > of SOM, in LILA it ought to have been the emergence of 4th.
> > level. But more on INTELLECT in another post.
> >
> > > Do you think quality can manifest itself in any way without the
> > > inorganic?
> >
> > The quick answer is "no", but it requires some explanation. At
> > first Pirsig put great emphasize on a QUALITY outside the MOQ
> > (that creates an infinite regress) He later "recanted" and said that
> > the Quality he speaks about in ZAMM is the DQ of the MOQ. In
> > that case the basic postulate is Reality=DQ/SQ (which isn't
> > different from the Reality=Quality in any other respect than
> > removing the Quality outside/ahead of the MOQ) thus Quality's
> > first manifestation was/is the inorganic level.
> >
> > Everything in my opinion of course, but I can't add this at the end
> > of each sentence.
> >
> > Bo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>



-- 
"The only thing that separates us from the animals is...well, the truth is
nothing separates us from the animals."
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to