Quality is a collection of changing aggregates and has no absolute existence. Good point, btw.
On Nov 29, 2007 8:55 AM, Khaled Alkotob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pirsig's point is that even the blank wall has it's quality > > Is it well built? > Is it level and square? > Does it have good foundation? > And so on. > > So even the blank wall has its quality. In fact because it's a simpler > form, it's quality would be more universal than a piece of art whose > quality hinges on culture, space and time. > > > > Khaled > > > > > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:24:58 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > In ZMM, Pirsig uses realism to "prove" that Quality exists. > > Regardless or > > not if you subscribe to that theory, the line of logic he uses > > seems somewhat > > questionable. In claiming to remove "Quality" from the world, he > > isn't > > removing Quality per se, but rather removing differences between > > objects. By > > removing the distinction between fine art and a blank wall, he > > isn't removing a > > definitive aesthetic judgment, but rather our ability to perceive a > > difference > > between two scenarios. > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
