But you're still only removing the distinctions between the wall and the picture, and not any inherent "quality." Is it well built/Does it have good foundation? Well, that's purely subjective. We "know" what Quality is? Someone out there prefers the blank wall. Someone prefers PIL to Beethoven. Is there a definitive answer to someone who's wondering if PIL or Beethoven has more Quality? You can remove the notes, making them sound the same to the observers, but would that be Quality? In a message dated 11/29/2007 12:58:29 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pirsig's point is that even the blank wall has it's quality Is it well built? Is it level and square? Does it have good foundation? And so on. So even the blank wall has its quality. In fact because it's a simpler form, it's quality would be more universal than a piece of art whose quality hinges on culture, space and time. Khaled **************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001) Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
