Matt I enjoyed your post. thanks for taking the time
>Matt: >We can distinguish between liking a text and thinking it good. But doing so will be one more view set forth by an individual. For instance, Harold Bloom has done so on occasion to >enunciate why he doesn't enjoy one particular poet but isn't about deny the poet's place in the Western canon. All we have to do to get a distinction like that is to distinguish liking a text >for highly idiosyncratic reasons and placing it in high esteem because of its originality. let me complicate your above post with the following question. Does a First Edition, autographed copy of a literary work have more quality than a 30th printing paperback edition? How does a first edition book possess more quality than the later paper back? Are there two qualities to the book, one the spiritual ( content ) and the other the physical? Khaled Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
