Hi Redsky, welcome to the discussion (bedlam)

29 Nov. you wrote:

> In ZMM, Pirsig uses realism to "prove" that Quality exists.  
> Regardless or not if you subscribe to that theory, the line of logic
> he uses  seems somewhat questionable.  In claiming to remove "Quality"
> from the  world, he isn't removing Quality per se, but rather removing
> differences between  objects.  By removing the distinction between
> fine art and a blank wall, he  isn't removing a definitive aesthetic
> judgment, but rather our ability to  perceive a difference between two
> scenarios.

I guess this is the actual passage 

    His answer was an old one belonging to a philosophic 
    school that called itself realism.``A thing exists,'' he said, 
    ``if a world without it can't function normally. If we can 
    show that a world without Quality functions abnormally, 
    then we have shown that Quality exists, whether it's 
    defined or not.'' He thereupon proceeded to subtract 
    Quality from a description of the world as we know it. The 
    first casualty from such a subtraction, he said, would be 
    the fine arts. If you can't distinguish between good and 
    bad in the arts they disappear. ... and so on


This is ZAMM and fairly early while the Quality debate was a 
game Pirsig played with his teacher colleagues. Later - in LILA 
after the Reality=Quality postulate - such demonstrations became 
superfluous and useless. If quality is removed there is no 
existence at all, full stop!. But the (Q=R) is a postulate (taken for 
granted by the 'postulant', but dubious to his contemporaries) the 
first ever step into a new metaphysics.

IMO Pirsig ought not have bothered with it any more, it can't be 
proved, the proof is in the pudding (the MOQ) If it produces a 
more coherent world than SOM it's proven fact (and THAT is 
does) but Pirsig could not quite let this be and in a letter to 
someone - ?? -  he used money and the stock marked as proof of 
Quality's prominence. Still IMO this is the MOQ from SOM's 
premises (where value is a "unassimilated" term) and this will 
never jell.

Bo




Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to