[Bo] I like your blunt style, but am impervious to such arguments. The proof of the MOQ is the enormous explanatory power - compared to the SOM - which is due to the level system.
[Krimel] Or one can regard the MoQ a way to construct and evaluate levels. It shows us that whatever levels or point of view we adopt we will see similar patterns of static and dynamic quality at work. [Bo] The initial Quality=Reality (all is value) sentence is a postulate and can't be proved. I find Pirsig's many demonstrations futile, the proof is the new world order and its ensuing clarity, but it - first - requires an open mind and then a different understanding of the 4th. Level. [Krimel] Calling the Tao Quality was a serious mislabeling. Equating it with reality is a violation of the spirit as well as the intent of leaving the Tao undefined. Illusions on illusions of illusions of Value. Note to Matt: Beware the Level Headed for they have lost The Way. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
