Absolutely SA ... my reference to Paul Turner was the same reference , Paul was bringing his analysis of Buddhist texts to this, looking at different "flavours" of Buddhism and different western translations / interpretations of these.
I was simply attributing Paul bringing it to the MoQ-Dicuss debate previously. (It's a pity Paul has "gone dormant".) Ian On 12/5/07, Heather Perella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Ian says to Krimel in which Ian agrees with > gav's usage of Paul Turner's tetralemma approach] > > Causation is in fact a pretty limited metaphor here - > I prefer Paul (Turrner)'s "dependent arising". > > > "dependent arising" is also found in buddhism > called 'dependent origination'. > > > SA > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Looking for last minute shopping deals? > Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. > http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
