Hi David, If you can recognize them, then you can ignore those you don't need to sustain.
Marsha At 01:56 PM 12/7/2007, you wrote: >Hi Marsha > >what about when we don't need to sustain them? >what do we/can we do then? > >Thanks >David M > > > > > While sustaining biological and social patterns > > Kill all intellectual patterns. > > Kill them completely > > And then follow Dynamic Quality > > And morality will be served. > > (LILA, Chapter 32) > > > > > > At least that's how I try to live it. Of course, occasionally I > > forget. Even most my chattering is play (except the feminist stuff.) > > > > Marsha > > > > > > > > > > > > At 02:45 PM 12/4/2007, you wrote: > >> > >>In a message dated 12/1/2007 7:23:36 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> > >>If we value certain values more because we value more value in them, > >>i.e., because our values help us value these values, then why do > >>people who evaluate art value between what's "value" and what they > >>"value?" > >>--- > >> > >>I bet I could tighten further by transforming the word 'people' and > >>the pronouns into 'valuing agents'. I might also ask why you asked > >>the question? What is there other than value? > >> > >> > >> > >>That's pretty much the essence of what I was getting at. What is there > >>besides value? Well, I always found Pirsig's justification for believing > >>in > >>"quality" somewhat flimsy, and coming from an > >>(admittedly, untutored) artistic > >>background, it seems curious to me that Pirsig feels that > >>a definite break in > >>absolute quality (not subjective) can exist between two works of art. I > >>suppose you could say I value Bob Dylan's "Planet Waves" on > >>a personal level but > >>reject its value on an artistic level, but here I'm operating on two > >>planes, > >>one of which relates to what matters to me (the former) and one as > >>to what my > >>opinions mean to others (the latter). But in those grooves, there is a > >>(relatively) steady rhythm, no one hits any bum notes...so from > >>that point of > >>view, the record has a lot of value (Quality?). > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>**************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's > >>hottest > >>products. > >>(http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001) > >>Moq_Discuss mailing list > >>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > >>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > >>Archives: > >>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > >>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > Archives: > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > > > >Moq_Discuss mailing list >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >Archives: >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
