At 07:56 AM 1/7/2008, you wrote: >Marsha: >So while the practices may have benefit, the teachings are not for >me. For me they do not address the Universal Feminine. Not even >remotely. To me, it's one-sided and laughable. As Jack Nickolson >said in the movie 'Witches of Eastwick', "Good for the man, bad for >the woman". > >Now the thing is, I cannot prove I'm right. But neither can you >prove you're right. So why don't we just leave it at: > >"While sustaining biological and social patterns >Kill all intellectual patterns. >Kill them completely >And then follow Dynamic Quality >And morality will be served." > (LILA, Chapter 32) > > > >Ron: >Gender is an intellectual pattern. Any conception about it is an >intellectual pattern... kill intellectual patterns. >
Ron, And that would make the Tao teachings conceptions and intellectual patterns to be killed too. Marsha Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
