Ron, comments below:
> Ron said:
> So, this is where static meets dynamic,
> pre-intellect is dynamic
> quality. Once one is in the dynamic you are dealing
> with the mystical.
> DmB, would you loosely describe this as an
> awareness? A dynamic
> awareness arrived at through static intellectual
> patterns?
>
> dmb says:
> If dynamic quality is pre-intellectual then,
> obviously, it is NOT
> arrived at through static intellectual patterns.
> What sense would it
> make to ask if our pre-human ancestors were arrived
> at through humanity?
> None! Intellect is AFTER dynamic quality, follows
> from dynamic quality,
> is derived from dynamic quality. That's why we call
> it PRE-intellectual.
> It is also called the primary empirical reality
> because it is what we
> experience PRIOR to any static interpretations.
> C'mon Ron. Are you
> pulling my leg, or what?
> Ron:
> No Dmb, just looking at it from another pov. Thanks
> for your time.
> You clarified much for me.
> It clears up some issues understanding that Bo's
> meta-level is DQ.
> What was confusing is understanding how
> pre-intellect fit into
> The levels.
Ron, maybe your getting it now. Here's another
one, but I don't want to throw too much at you. Each
level is imbedded with dynamic quality too, thus, each
static level doesn't reach any absolute definition for
each static level is experiencing something dynamic
that doesn't allow the static level is harden into a
'set in stone definition'. I've mentioned this to you
before, but now I see why you didn't get it.
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
