Another moronic response as anyone can plainly see.
> [Arlo had said] > Another fine example of the moronic rhetoric this thread began by > condemning. > > [Platt] > Same to you, pal. > > [Arlo] > Except I am not the one engaging in distortive rhetoric. But anyone > who can read can see that. Your "Pee Wee Maneuver" here is without merit. > > [Arlo had said] > Your rhetorical association between "nationalistic > blindness" and "national defense", as if the two are merely two > viewpoints on one approach, is not only outrageous, but when said in > response to everything I had written shows only the blatant > distortion wielded by those who attempt to use social-level > talk-radio rhetoric to attack and break down any reasonable dialogue. > > [Platt] > A moronic assertion. > > [Arlo] > Any one who can read, and who has seen your last few responses, can > see that this is a valid assertion. Any one just joining can easily > check the past few posts. > > [Platt] > If you have no national pride, why defend yourself? > > [Arlo] > And as if on cue you toss out yet another moronic response. Can you > point out where I said ANYTHING about having "national pride", let > alone implying it is a "bad thing"? This is the type of idiotic, > distortive, moronic rhetoric that is morally called for what it is. > > [Arlo had said] > We can take great pride in our defeat of Hitler, but until we > recognize and admit that Henry Ford is emblematic of the historical > foundation that created Hitler's power in the first place our victory > is only partial. > > [Platt] > What nonsense. Now Hitler's rise was our fault. And I suppose we > deserved to get hit by Islamic radicals. Speaking of morons . . . > > [Arlo] > And a final example of the extreme moronic crap that comes from > talk-radio discourse. Yes, I am speaking of morons, Platt, and your > rhetoric evidences what you are. > > Not only did I never say Hitler's rise was "our fault", but your > baseless and evil claim that "Arlo thinks we deserve to get hit by > Islamic radicals" demonstrates the EXACT kind of stupid discourse > that we must rebel against. > > And if you think that Henry Fords receiving of the top Nazi honor for > his support of Hitler had NOTHING to do with Hitler's rise to power, > and was not emblamatic of the stage that many nations and individuals > outside Germany helped create, then you are worse than a blind fool. > You could start by reading William Shirer's award winning The Rise > and Falll of the Third Reich to gain a better understanding of the > international decisions and attitudes that led to the Reich, the > foundations and backdrop that was cast that not only enabled a Hitler > to rise to power, but like Henry Ford, but promoted it. But, hey, why > let a little thing like history get in the way... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
