[Platt]
Another moronic response as anyone can plainly see.

[Arlo]
Classic Pee-Wee. Expected, since I knew you'd have no other option in 
the face of substantive challenges to your inane and moronic 
rhetoric. Its the Rush Limbaugh way.

Nothing to justify your moronic association of "national blindness" 
and "national defense".

Nothing to justify your moronic insinuation that "Arlo thinks having 
national pride is bad".

Nor anything to justify your moronic assertion that "Arlo thinks we 
deserved to get attacked by Islamic radicals", or that "Arlo thinks 
Hitler was our fault".

Nor even anything to counter the historians like Shirer who have laid 
forth phenomenal insights into the stage on which Hitler rose.

Nope. Nothing.

Nothing but the classic, anti-intellectual, sophomoric and moronic 
rhetorical devices of talk radio. The Classic Pee-Wee.

And as started this thread, I find nothing immoral about calling this 
for what it is. Thanks for the lovely demonstration of the forms of 
moronic discourse in question, from the distortive and outrageous 
"And I suppose we deserved to get hit by Islamic radicals" to the 
deceptive pairing of "nationalistic blindness" to "national defense". 
To this final Pee-Wee. Your replies have been textbook in providing 
the examples that you yourself ostensibly wanted to see.

Kudos.

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to