[Arlo had asked]
Will we see any substantive reply, or simply more moronic,
anti-intellectual talk-radio rhetoric? Another Pee-Wee perhaps?
[Platt]
Does this guy have a life? More moronic nonsense.
[Arlo]
In other words, you have no answer to any of the points made (I can
repeat them, if you try to deny any were made), no defense for your
moronic assertions (as articulated clearly and precisely), and so, lo
and behold, exactly as predicted, another idiotic attempt to use a
Pee-Wee (what is that, four in a row? Is that a record?). And while
the Limbaugh response here would be to imply that no substantive
points were made, anyone can simply go back one email to see that
they were (I'm happy to repost them as well). But I'm sure you'll
give it a shot anyway. Your evasions are pathetic, even if they are
expected and understandable.
What we see here is exactly the kind of anti-intellectual rhetoric
that I had originally condemned. And rightly pointed out why it
should be condemned as moronic, and those who rely on it should be
condemned as idiots. We have seen how a dialogue is assaulted and
dragged from valid points of discussion into the mire of idiotic
talk-show, anti-intellectual rhetoric by those who only recourse to
challenges is to try to distort ("'Nationalistic blindness' or
'national defense' are debatable viewpoints"), demonize ("And I
suppose we deserved to get hit by Islamic radicals?"), and evade
(such as this latest response to four specific points).
So, thanks for proving my point.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
