Hi Jorge,

Jorge:
>     I don't want to go into more examples but I hope
>I've made myself clear; we might  all know how to
>distinguish a thick from a thin pullover; very few, if
>any, of us, or elsewhere, knows where to draw  neat
>lines of separation between biological and social and
>intellectual. It's not that we are dumb; it's just
>that we are dealing with complexity and I'll repeat:
>complexity entails ambiguity. 

Steve:
Thick and thin are on a continuum. I don't see how inorganic, biological, 
social, and intellectual are on a continuum.

You raised the issue of ants as social. Ants do not participate in social 
patterns, period. Ant colonies are not on a continuum with human societies. 
There are no learned behaviors that are passed from generation to generation 
among ants.  Ants do not copy the behavior of other ants. In other words, there 
are no "cool" ants that all the other ants want to be like. There is no 
evidence that I am aware of that different ant hills develop different ant 
cultures. 

There is some evidence of this in higher primates, so I agree that it can be 
difficult to distinguish whether we are looking at social patterns or 
biological patterns in a given instance, but that doesn't mean that social and 
biological patterns are on the same continuum.  

The question in determining whether a pattern is social or biological is 
whether this is a pattern of preference that is maintained through genetic 
encoding and  interacting with the physical environment, or is this a pattern 
of preference that is maintained in the way that cultures are 
maintained--passed along from parent to child and copying celebrities and roles 
that aren't hard-wired like ant roles, etc. Sometimes this is easy to do and 
sometimes it is hard, but the difference between the types of patterns 
themselves is not fuzzy.

Regards,
Steve


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to