SA previously:
> Ron, what was so bothersome about what Magnus said?
> 
> Ron:
> Welcome back SA, missed your input.

SA:  Thank you Ron.  This is a tough forum to feel
valued within, especially when I try to apply input at
times and nobody talks back.  Yet, we've all probably
experienced that one time or another.  There is the
dynamic undefined aspect where all I's, us's, 'felt
values', and appreciations disappear.  It levels the
playing field for all.


Ron:
> ...diversion of the discussion muddying the water
> and then asking what my point is all with a 
> condescending flair just gets tiresome, I'm not
> feeling well and should probably just bag
> the discussion for the time being.

SA:  Sorry to hear your not feeling well.  What is the
"not feeling well"?  I had the flu, with a very
terrible congestion in my cheeks and forehead this
past week and weekend.  The congestion was to the
point that my ears were hurting me the most.  I
couldn't wait until the pain in my ears disappeared. 
I still have remnants of the sickness lingering.
     We could stick to some points that I was looking
forward to hearing a response from you.  It does seem
you are making a 'all is intellect' approach.  I
remember when you posted here that you told your child
that this is 'all in the mind' (to paraphrase).  Did I
remember this correctly?  
     How do you view the early solar system when
humankind wasn't around?  I guess ones view is more
important to hear about than to always try to convince
them or baptize them to what others believe to be
true.  It would be nice to hear how you view this.  We
could debate, but that might not be what your looking
for at the moment.  I really don't know how to debate
against somebody that believes the world is all their
in mind.  I don't think somebody could debate against
what I might believe either on points, such as the
bridge story I wrote - I mean how does one debate
that.  I guess one could try, and I might respond, but
that could lead to a bogging down of events were
creativity is sacrificed.  


     Ron:
> Good to have you back. Liked the bridge Story.

SA:  Thanks Ron.  I'm trying to balance my comments
here.  I noticed you responded back to me, so I wanted
to answer you, but my responses might not always come
back quickly anymore.  But respond I will.  Which
reminds me... I did want to hear more about where
Margaret lives, but I'll get to that post of hers in
the near days.
     Thanks also for the comment about the bridge
story.  It was fun and impromptu.  That's what I love
about writing stories or poems.  I don't know where
they are going and I find myself walking along a path
in the dark where a fiery torch lights up more and
more as I continue to take steps.  If I don't like how
events are taking place, they're getting too boring or
bogged down like one long still picture, then I'll
move the scene into something else to see what will
happen dynamically, on its' own with each new
introduction into the storyline.  Also, this story had
a metaphysical grounding that I felt differed from
what I was dominantly reading here on the forum for
weeks, so, I playfully wanted to talk about a bridge,
too.  Anyways... thanks for the compliment,
encouragement is a great gift to give.

Thanks.

icy blue sky,
SA  


      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to