Ian:
> I haven't quite picked-up on the context of Ron's
> "bridge" metaphor here ?
SA: I wrote a post earlier in the week called "bridge
musing". That's where the bridge metaphor comes from.
Actually, I wrote a story in that post by the same
name and it was inspired by a poem Marsha posted by
Pavin (I think the name was). Then recently Ron
mentioned 'bridge is value'.
Ian:
> Clearly (dynamic) quality is about connections ... a
> relationship, an
> interaction, a participation ...
> subject-interaction-object as a more
> fundametal atom than either subject or object.
> So I would see the bridging - the bridge AND the
> things bridged - as
> the "quality". I may have missed your point ?
SA: You got it. That's exactly what we're talking
about. Thus, why I find between the levels dynamic
quality. That's were the code of art happens.
Between the levels a split occurs from the static
patterns with dynamic quality and if a static latch
occurs, then a static pattern reaches a new level or
new static pattern. This is why I find the
distinction between the levels both distinct, and
fuzzy. Distinct for as the levels are specific
categories and as long as all of static reality is in
these four levels only, and these levels are distinct
books of identity. Fuzzy for creativity, for movement
sake of certain static patterns. I don't think static
patterns are locked/stuck into any pattern.
Emergences and movements/changes happen.
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
