SA, Ron, I haven't quite picked-up on the context of Ron's "bridge" metaphor here ?
Clearly (dynamic) quality is about connections ... a relationship, an interaction, a participation ... subject-interaction-object as a more fundametal atom than either subject or object. So I would see the bridging - the bridge AND the things bridged - as the "quality". I may have missed your point ? Ian On 2/13/08, Heather Perella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ron, and Ian, > > > > SA previously: > > We could stick to some points that I was > > looking forward to hearing a response from you. It > does > > seem you are making a 'all is intellect' approach. > I > > remember when you posted here that you told your > > child that this is 'all in the mind' (to > paraphrase). Did > > I remember this correctly? > > How do you view the early solar system when > > humankind wasn't around? > > > > Ron: > > You get me wrong, I've been saying our perception > > is limited and distorted. I say how we understand > > objects is 90% of how objects are viewed. When many > > understand them in a like manner they take on a > reality of their > > own. Just as how my words have been interpreted > here is > > how Reality gets filtered and exaggerated. > Information > > is Skimmed, summed and condensed. I'm not saying "I > > think therefore I am" I'm saying "I am part of a > complex society > > therefore I think " therefore I think "I think > therefore I am" > > > SA: I understand the whole society influences our > thinking. I understand I'm in a culture. I guess > that's all your pointing out? > > > > SA previously: > > I really don't know how to debate > > against somebody that believes the world is all > > their in mind.. > > > Ron: > > Not all in the mind, what we perceive is interpreted > > By the mind. > > > SA: Yes. I think as Marsha's been trying to point > out. The orientation of the kind of experience is > what's defining dynamic quality or static quality. > Each of the SPoV's are experiencing, thus, taking > another step in the understanding, a step that is not > mind-centered. > > > > > Ron: > > Value is a bridge > > > SA: As Ian pointed out. The seemingly > counter-experiences of authority and > questioning-authority, and these two are sourced by > quality, thus, I believe Ian is using quality, as a > guide, as a bridge, to understand more the difference > between the two - something more is happening and the > bridge will clearly define better than any one part. > Ian, isn't this what you are driving at? > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. > http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
