DMB, Chris, Steve, Bo, and all MoQists --
This may be a silly question, and I know it's been discussed before, but I have always been confused about Pirsig's use of "static" for S/O patterns and "dynamic" for the Quality that supports them. And I suspect that I'm not alone in this confusion. I've been told that DQ is dynamic because it gives rise to patterns (or at least encompasses them), but that doesn't seem to properly describe the unchanging foundational Quality, or the fact that most patterns are experienced as changing or evolving in some away. For example, Chris has stated (correctly, I think, by MoQ standards): > A ROCK - From a MOQ perspective...is a static inorganic pattern. > It may also be used as an expression of social values depending on > how it is used, and if the intellectual level is to look at a rock it > would > be - a rock, an object made up of matter. Whatever matter is ^__^ Marsha: > A rock is first of all a static pattern of value. If a rock is a static pattern of value, is a meteor (also a rock) that flashes across the sky a static pattern? You folks call Biology a level, rather than a pattern. But is the biological process by which a fertilized cell multiplies, differentiates and becomes a living organism a static pattern? Or are the the sperm cell, the egg, the embryo. the fetus, and the infant each a separate pattern? In other words, when does a pattern begin (from a level), and are there any patterns that may be regarded as dynamic? It seems to me that everything that exists is in some state of flux, moving from simple to complex, or evolving from the lowest (inorganic) to the highest (intellectual) level. If S/O reality is constantly changing, why are its components not dynamic? Tangential to this is another question. Chris suggested above that social values may also be patterns. If this is true, does it mean that moral precepts or emotional feelings like Awareness, Freedom, Love, Justice, and Fear are social or intellectual patterns? Are these "intermediate states" of recognized patterns, or are they only myths abstracted from Quality? I'm not being critical; I simply need to understand the dynamics of this hierarchy as a logical ontology. (If, indeed, "dynamics" is the correct word.) Thanks for your help. --Ham Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
