SA: Ron, this is easy, correct? I was only calling coal an organic rock, yes, due to "what it once was", and this is also what is taught in geology courses. My old textbook calls coal an organic rock. Yes, also when I look in my old textbook, coal is in the sedimentary rock section. Geologists do think about what the grains of a rock once were to help them understand what a strata once was millions of years ago or yesterday. If you find coal in a strata, then millions of years ago the area may have been a swamp - depends on the context, thus, what the other layers of rock refer to as well. Your deduction in thinking a rock could be social according to this line of thinking is understandable, but I don't think geologists are concerned about social patterns except for paleontologists. Yet, I still haven't heard of geologists calling certain rocks - social rocks.
Is this topic inspirational? Sorry, I need to ask, didn't think it was a hot button issue. Ron: SA, just interested in the formation of your terminology. I thought the concept of static patterns creating themselves Was interesting and was curious by what you meant by it. ________________________________________________________________________ ____________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
