STEVe, Just pushing it to an extreme, seeing where SA was coming from. If an organic form is the vessel in which minerals collect over time, Does it qualify as a biological rock? The classification considers what It once was not what it is currently. Just poking around. Exploring Conceptions of Rocks and minerals.
-Ron -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Peterson Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [MD] Patterns Hi Ron, SA, On Tuesday, February 19, 2008, at 03:20PM, "Heather Perella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Ron: >> To conclude that coal is biological by virtue of >> what it once was would >> be making The same deduction as stating that it is >> social wouldn't it? Or am I missing it. I can see how coal suggests participation in biological patterns but not social patterns. Just because dinosaurs may have lived in groups does not meam they participated in social patterns. A group of biological entities is just a group of biological entities not a social entity. Regards, Steve Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
